Example of A Research Report (Template)

Synthetic Research Report: Usability Testing of “AppEase” Mobile Application

Executive Summary

This usability study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction of users interacting with the newly designed “AppEase” mobile application, which serves as a task management tool. The study included 8 participants from a target demographic of professionals aged 25-45. The primary goal was to identify usability issues in the app’s interface and gather insights into user experience to inform design improvements.

Research Objectives

  • Objective 1: To assess the ease of task creation and completion within the app.
  • Objective 2: To evaluate the intuitiveness of the app’s navigation and layout.
  • Objective 3: To measure user satisfaction with the overall experience.
  • Objective 4: To identify common pain points and usability barriers in the current design.

Research Methods

  • Participants: 8 participants (4 male, 4 female) aged 25-45, with varying levels of technical proficiency. All participants were professional users of task management applications.
  • Methodology: A combination of task-based usability testing, think-aloud protocol, and post-test interviews was used.
  • Tasks: Participants were asked to perform a series of tasks including:
    • Task 1: Create a new task and set a due date.
    • Task 2: Assign the task to a team member.
    • Task 3: Mark a task as complete.
    • Task 4: Use the app’s search function to find a specific task.
  • Metrics: Task completion time, success rates, error rates, and user satisfaction were measured. The System Usability Scale (SUS) survey was used to gather post-test user satisfaction data.

Data Collection and Results

Task Completion Rates
  • Task 1 (Create a new task): 100% success rate. All participants were able to create a new task within 2 minutes on average.
  • Task 2 (Assign the task): 75% success rate. 2 participants had difficulty locating the “Assign” button due to poor contrast with the background color.
  • Task 3 (Mark task as complete): 100% success rate. Participants easily marked tasks as complete.
  • Task 4 (Search function): 50% success rate. 4 participants were unable to successfully locate the search bar due to its placement at the bottom of the screen.
Error Rates
  • Task 2: 25% error rate (difficulty locating the “Assign” button).
  • Task 4: 50% error rate (difficulty finding the search function).
User Satisfaction (SUS Score)
  • Average SUS Score: 75 (out of 100), indicating a generally favorable experience, but with room for improvement.
Qualitative Insights (Think-Aloud & Interviews)
  • Positive Feedback:
    • “The interface is very clean and straightforward. Task creation was easy.”
    • “I like the color scheme, it feels modern and professional.”
    • “The app feels fast and responsive.”
  • Pain Points:
    • “The search bar is hard to find. I would expect it at the top of the screen.”
    • “I wasn’t sure how to assign a task at first. The button is too small and blends into the background.”
    • “The notifications for tasks due are not very noticeable.”
  • Suggestions for Improvement:
    • Task assignment: Increase the visibility of the “Assign” button with better contrast and a larger font size.
    • Search function: Move the search bar to a more intuitive location at the top of the screen for better discoverability.
    • Notifications: Make due date notifications more prominent, perhaps with a badge or banner alert.

Analysis and Recommendations

  • Issue 1: Task Assignment Difficulty: The “Assign” button’s visibility is insufficient, causing confusion for users. Recommendation: Improve contrast and size to increase accessibility and usability.
  • Issue 2: Search Function Discoverability: Participants struggled to find the search bar, leading to task failures. Recommendation: Relocate the search bar to a more prominent position at the top of the screen and increase its size.
  • Issue 3: Notifications: The app’s task notifications were not sufficiently noticeable, leading to missed tasks. Recommendation: Implement a more eye-catching notification system, possibly with push notifications or banner alerts that draw more attention.

Conclusion

Overall, the “AppEase” mobile application performed well in terms of basic task completion, with most users successfully completing tasks such as creating and marking tasks as complete. However, issues with navigation (search function and task assignment) and visibility of notifications were identified as key areas for improvement. With these changes, the app’s usability and user experience can be significantly enhanced, leading to a more intuitive and satisfying experience for users.

Actionable Next Steps:

  1. Redesign the Task Assignment Interface: Improve button size, contrast, and location.
  2. Relocate the Search Bar: Move it to a more prominent location at the top of the screen.
  3. Enhance Notifications: Implement more noticeable alerts for task due dates.
  4. Follow-Up Testing: Conduct a second round of usability testing after implementing design changes to validate improvements.

Appendices

  1. Task Instructions and Scripts: Details of tasks given to participants.
  2. Participant Demographics: Information about participant backgrounds.
  3. SUS Questionnaire Results: Survey responses and analysis of user satisfaction.

This report synthesizes insights from both qualitative and quantitative data, providing actionable recommendations for enhancing the usability and user experience of the “AppEase” app.